Saltar para o conteúdo
Radio Logo
PodcastsNotíciasFaithful Politics

Faithful Politics

Faithful Politics Podcast
Faithful Politics
Último episódio

542 episódios

  • Faithful Politics

    Why Christian Zionism Threatens Palestinian Christians | Daniel Bannoura

    07/11/2026 | 52min
    Palestinian Christians are often missing from American church conversations about Israel, even as many evangelicals view support for Israel as a religious obligation. Dr. Daniel Bannoura, a Palestinian theologian raised near Bethlehem and director of public engagement at the Bethlehem Institute for Peace and Justice, explains what that disconnect looks like from the other side. He discusses Christian Zionism, dispensational theology, biblical prophecy, the displacement of Palestinian communities in 1948, and the devastation in Gaza and the West Bank.
    Bannoura also talks about growing up evangelical and how that shaped his view of Scripture, before confronting the ways Christians use biblical passages to justify political power and violence. He challenges Western churches to listen to Palestinian Christians and reconsider what faithfulness requires. Josh reflects on the theology he inherited about Israel and how difficult those beliefs can be to question, even when faced with Palestinian suffering.
    GUEST BIODr. Daniel Bannoura is a Palestinian theologian, Qur'an scholar, and director of public engagement at the Bethlehem Institute for Peace and Justice. Originally from Bethlehem, he earned his PhD in Qur'anic studies at the University of Notre Dame, where his research examined the Qur'an in the context of late antiquity. His work also addresses Christian-Muslim relations, Palestinian theology, and the influence of Christian Zionism on Western churches. He is the founder and co-host of Across the Divide, a podcast exploring faith, justice, and Palestine-Israel.
  • Faithful Politics

    Does the Supreme Court Favor Christians? Stephen Feldman on Religious Freedom

    03/11/2026 | 1h 8min
    Constitutional law scholar Stephen M. Feldman argues that the Roberts Court has changed the meaning of religious freedom and who fully belongs under the Constitution. Drawing from his book Who Belongs: White Christian Nationalism and the Roberts Court, Feldman traces the fight over “We the People” from the founding and Reconstruction through the New Deal, the Warren Court, and today's conservative Supreme Court. He explains how the constitutional shift beginning around 1937 helped expand protections for voting, free speech, and equal participation.
    We also examine originalism and its reliance on historical interpretations developed when many Americans were excluded from political participation. Feldman compares Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, involving a public school football coach's prayer, with Mahmoud v. Taylor, involving religious objections to LGBTQ+ inclusive classroom books. The discussion explores whether religious freedom is being applied consistently, how the Court's approach intersects with white Christian nationalism, and what these decisions mean for church-state separation and American democracy.
    Book
    Book: Who Belongs: White Christian Nationalism and the Roberts Court
    Author: Stephen M. Feldman
    Bookshop.org: https://bookshop.org/a/112456/9781479841165
    Guest Bio
    Stephen M. Feldman is a retired distinguished professor of law and adjunct professor of political science at the University of Wyoming, where he taught constitutional law and jurisprudence for more than two decades. His scholarship examines constitutional interpretation, democracy, religious liberty, and the relationship between law and politics. He is the author of Who Belongs: White Christian Nationalism and the Roberts Court and Pack the Court! A Defense of Supreme Court Expansion. Feldman retired in summer 2026 after four decades of teaching constitutional law.
    University profile: https://www.uwyo.edu/law/directory/step-feldman.html
  • Faithful Politics

    She Survived Her Execution. Can the State Try Again? | Corinna Lain

    31/10/2026 | 1h 11min
    Law professor and former prosecutor Corinna Lain returns to Faithful Politics to examine two disturbing developments in America's death penalty system: the botched lethal injection of Christa Pike in Tennessee and the Trump administration's proposal to publicly livestream the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan.
    Drawing on her book Secrets of the Killing State, Lain explains why lethal injections fail, how execution protocols leave room for serious mistakes, and why the Supreme Court has allowed states to attempt executions a second time. We also discuss firing squads, the constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment, and the political appeal of public executions.
    The conversation turns to a larger question about justice, redemption, and whether the death penalty serves any meaningful purpose. Lain also explains why, despite renewed political attention, capital punishment has been declining in the United States.
    Book: Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection: https://bookshop.org/a/112456/9781479832965
    Author's book page: https://corinnalain.com/books/secrets-of-the-killing-state/
    Bio:
    Corinna Barrett Lain is the George E. Allen Chair in Law at the University of Richmond School of Law, where she specializes in constitutional law, criminal procedure, and capital punishment. A former prosecutor and U.S. Army veteran, she is the author of Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection. Her research examines botched executions, government secrecy, and the constitutional limits of capital punishment. She has spent years investigating how executions are conducted and why lethal injection frequently fails to work as intended.
  • Faithful Politics

    Why Christians Vote So Differently: Greg Smith on Trump and the Midterms

    27/10/2026 | 58min
    Pew Research Center's Greg Smith joins Faithful Politics to explain why Christians who share similar religious beliefs often vote for opposing political parties. With the 2026 midterms approaching, we examine the differences between white evangelicals, Black Protestants, Catholics, and religiously unaffiliated voters, and what those differences could mean for the election.
    Smith also explains why many evangelicals support Donald Trump despite questioning his personal religious commitment, why the economy matters more to religious voters than abortion or LGBTQ issues, and what Americans think about churches endorsing political candidates. We also discuss a surprising finding: most Christians believe people can disagree about Trump and still be good Christians.
    Guest Bio: Gregory A. Smith is Senior Associate Director of Research at Pew Research Center, where he studies religion in American life and its relationship to politics. He has helped lead Pew's major Religious Landscape Studies and has conducted extensive research on religious identity, political affiliation, and public opinion. His work provides insight into how Americans' religious beliefs and practices intersect with voting behavior, political priorities, and changing demographic trends.
    These Pew Research Center resources directly support the topics discussed in the interview.
    Religious Groups Differ Widely in Their 2026 Midterm Preferences - Gregory A. Smith's October 13 research, including the 73% Republican preference among white evangelicals and 74% Democratic preference among Black Protestants.
    How Americans Feel About Religion's Influence in Government and Public Life - Research on religion in politics, Christian nationalism, and church involvement in elections.
    Most Americans Think Churches Should Not Endorse Political Candidates - Historical polling showing 79% opposition to church endorsements in 2026.
  • Faithful Politics

    Are Our Elections Safer Than We Think? | Jessica Huseman

    24/10/2026 | 49min
    Votebeat Editorial Director Jessica Huseman returns to Faithful Politics to discuss the security of America's elections andthe challenges facing voters and election officials ahead of the 2026 midterms. We examine concerns about federal interference at polling locations, voter registration problems in Texas, turmoil within Georgia's State Election Board, and allegations of widespread noncitizen voting.
    Despite growing public distrust, Jessica explains why election officials remain confident in the voting process and why many fears about election security exceed the actual risks. We also discuss misinformation, legal challenges, and why the biggest concerns may emerge after Election Day, when votes are counted and results are challenged.
    Check out what Votebeat has to offer: https://www.votebeat.org
    GUEST BIOJessica Huseman is the editorial director of Votebeat, a nonprofit newsroom focused exclusively on voting and election administration. She oversees reporting on election security, voting laws, voter registration, misinformation, and the challenges facing local election officials. Her newsroom investigates how election systems operate and helps journalists across the country access election experts through Votebeat's Election Expert Desk. A returning guest on Faithful Politics, Jessica brings detailed reporting and practical insight into the challenges facing American elections ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Mais podcasts de Notícias
Sobre Faithful Politics
Dive into the profound world of Faithful Politics, a compelling podcast where the spheres of faith and politics converge in meaningful dialogues. Guided by Pastor Josh Burtram (Faithful Host) and Will Wright (Political Host), this unique platform invites listeners to delve into the complex impact of political choices on both the faithful and faithless.Join our hosts, Josh and Will, as they engage with world-renowned experts, scholars, theologians, politicians, journalists, and ordinary folks. Their objective? To deepen our collective understanding of the intersection between faith and politics.Faithful Politics sets itself apart by refusing to subscribe to any single political ideology or religious conviction. This approach is mirrored in the diverse backgrounds of our hosts. Will Wright, a disabled Veteran and African-Asian American, is a former atheist and a liberal progressive with a lifelong intrigue in politics. On the other hand, Josh Burtram, a Conservative Republican and devoted Pastor, brings a passion for theology that resonates throughout the discourse.Yet, in the face of their contrasting outlooks, Josh and Will display a remarkable ability to facilitate respectful and civil dialogue on challenging topics. This opens up a space where listeners of various political and religious leanings can find value and deepen their understanding.So, regardless if you're a Democrat or Republican, a believer or an atheist, we assure you that Faithful Politics has insightful conversations that will appeal to you and stimulate your intellectual curiosity. Come join us in this enthralling exploration of the intricate nexus of faith and politics. Add us to your regular podcast stream and don't forget to subscribe to our YouTube Channel. Let's navigate this fascinating realm together! Not Right. Not Left. UP.
Sítio Web de podcast

Ouve Faithful Politics, Eixo do Mal e muitos outros podcasts de todo o mundo com a aplicação radio.pt

Obtenha a aplicação gratuita radio.pt

  • Guardar rádios e podcasts favoritos
  • Transmissão via Wi-Fi ou Bluetooth
  • Carplay & Android Audo compatìvel
  • E ainda mais funções