BackTable Urology

Not every pediatric GU injury fits neatly into the guidelines. In this episode of BackTable Urology, trauma reconstructive urologist Dr. Travis Pagliara (Hennepin County Medical Center) joins hosts Dr. Arthi Hannallah and Dr. Niccolo Passoni to walk through practical management of pediatric renal, bladder, urethral, and genital injuries. Through case-based discussion, they highlight diagnostic decision-making, when to observe versus intervene, and how to approach these patients in the acute setting.

---

SYNPOSIS

The conversation also explores operative pearls, the role of technologies like the Optilume balloon, and why thoughtful short-term follow up is critical for both patient outcomes and clinician learning. Together, they emphasize a measured, conservative mindset whenever appropriate to minimize morbidity while delivering high-quality trauma care.

---

TIMESTAMPS

00:00 - Introduction03:07 - Kidney and Ureteric Trauma19:16 - Urethral Trauma34:42 - MRI vs Ultrasound47:56 - Collaboration in Reconstructive Urology52:26 - Testicular Trauma57:29 - Epididymal Injury01:02:35 - Follow-Ups Matter01:05:14 - Foreign Body Stories01:06:52 - Career Advice

What do the 2025 AUA guidelines change about how we evaluate and manage chronic male pelvic pain? In this episode of BackTable Urology, Dr. Susan MacDonald (Penn State) joins host Dr. George Koch (Ohio State University) to break down the new American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines on chronic male pelvic pain, including chronic prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome and chronic scrotal content pain.

---

SYNPOSIS

They review a structured approach from initial evaluation and physical examination to pain management. The discussion outlines an evidence-informed, multimodal management framework incorporating medications, pelvic floor physical therapy, behavioral health interventions, neuromodulators, and selective procedural strategies, with an emphasis on realistic expectation setting in this complex patient population.

---

TIMESTAMPS

00:00 - Introduction01:41 - Path to Chronic Pelvic Pain Work08:19 - Getting Involved with the AUA13:02 - Developing Guidelines19:56 - Initial Patient Evaluation27:11 - Setting Expectations32:05 - Making the Diagnosis35:17 - Success Rates and Counseling Patients39:51 - Central Sensitization44:31 - Physical Exam Recommendations49:26 - Non-Pharmacologic Options54:38 - Follow Up Cadence01:02:24 - Chronic Scrotal Pain vs CPPS01:08:26 - Conclusion

---

RESOURCES

Diagnosis and Management of Male Chronic Pelvic Pain (Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome and Chronic Scrotal Content Pain): AUA Guideline (2025)https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/guidelines/male-chronic-pelvic-pain

What do you do when metastatic urothelial cancer responds dramatically to systemic therapy? In this episode of BackTable Urology, Dr. Abhinav Khanna (Mayo Clinic) speaks with host Dr. Daniel Roberson about the growing question of consolidative surgery after enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. They discuss how EV-pembro has reshaped treatment expectations, why unexpected complete or near-complete responses are prompting tumor board debates about cystectomy, and how careful multidisciplinary decision-making guides which patients may be considered for surgery.

---

SYNPOSIS

The conversation reviews early outcomes showing high rates of pathologic downstaging and the possibility that many patients may avoid additional systemic therapy after surgery, while emphasizing this approach is not yet standard of care. Dr. Khanna highlights coordination with medical oncology, radiology, and pathology, postoperative considerations, and the potential future role of biomarkers such as ctDNA. Ultimately, the episode underscores the need for clinical trials and thoughtful patient selection as clinicians navigate integrating surgery into an evolving systemic therapy landscape.

---

TIMESTAMPS

00:00 - Introduction02:19 - The Evolution of Urothelial Carcinoma Treatment05:23 - Rationale for Consolidative Surgery12:32 - Patient Selection Criteria15:23 - Surgical Approach and Considerations23:58 - Pathologic Findings31:34 - The Role of Radiation39:38 - Biomarkers44:10 - Prospective Trials and Future Directions53:06 - Guidance for Urologists

---

RESOURCES

Consolidative Surgery for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Following Induction Enfortumab Vedotin and/or Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: A Multicenter Analysishttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40425390/

Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancerhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2312117

Standard or Extended Lymphadenectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancerhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMoa2401497

Is transecting urethroplasty still the default, or is reconstructive urology moving beyond it? In this episode of BackTable Urology, Dr. Ben Breyer (University of California San Francisco) joins host Dr. George Koch (Ohio State University) to discuss evolving approaches in reconstructive urology with an emphasis on complex stricture cases.

---

SYNPOSIS

Throughout the conversation, Dr. Breyer reflects on his path into the subspecialty and breaks down the evolution of reconstructive practice, particularly the shift from anastomotic urethroplasty to non-transecting techniques. Dr. Breyer and Dr. Koch also discuss managing complex urethral strictures, including cases involving prior radiation and inflammatory conditions, while emphasizing thoughtful patient selection and surgical planning. Finally, they explore the current training landscape, challenges in patient access to subspecialty reconstructive care, and why patient-reported outcomes will play a central role in shaping future innovation in urethral reconstruction.

---

TIMESTAMPS

00:00 - Introduction05:40 - Evolution of Surgical Techniques10:01 - Managing Complex Cases14:19 - Education and Training in Reconstructive Urology23:45 - The Future of Reconstructive Urology28:45 - The Journey of a Reconstructive Urologist30:45 - Challenges in Urology Training and Practice35:35 - Addressing Urologist Shortages in Rural Areas48:34 - Innovations and Research in Reconstructive Urology57:25 - Final Thoughts

When is active surveillance the right choice for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients? In this episode of BackTable Urology, Dr. Claire de la Calle, Assistant Professor of Urology at the University of Washington, joins Dr. Ruchika Talwar to unpack how active surveillance has evolved beyond low-risk disease and why select Grade Group 2 patients may be appropriate candidates now with thoughtful patient selection.

---

SYNPOSIS

The conversation explores emerging tools that can refine surveillance decisions, including PSA density, MRI findings, genomic classifiers, and the growing role of AI-assisted pathology. Dr. de la Calle emphasizes the importance of nuanced patient counseling, acknowledging anxiety and long-term risk while reinforcing that time on active surveillance can be a meaningful win when oncologic outcomes remain comparable to upfront treatment.

---

TIMESTAMPS

00:00 - Introduction02:58 - Current Evidence05:03 - Patient Selection Criteria12:11 - Importance of PSA Density and Monitoring Protocols18:12 - Pathology and Genomic Testing32:18 - Future Directions and Research36:33 - Key Takeaways

---

RESOURCES

ProtecT Trial: Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancerhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2214122

Canary PASS Studyhttps://canarypass.org/

Genomic Classifier Performance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From NRG Oncology/RTOG 0126 Randomized Phase 3 Trialhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37137444